<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>边界锚定 on 太一知行</title><link>https://one.knowingaction.com/tags/%E8%BE%B9%E7%95%8C%E9%94%9A%E5%AE%9A/</link><description>Recent content in 边界锚定 on 太一知行</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:38:45 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://one.knowingaction.com/tags/%E8%BE%B9%E7%95%8C%E9%94%9A%E5%AE%9A/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title/><link>https://one.knowingaction.com/boundary-anchoring-and-collapsing-double-standards-20260429/</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://one.knowingaction.com/boundary-anchoring-and-collapsing-double-standards-20260429/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;在关于幼儿园水壶清洗的日常琐碎中，外婆出于担忧，提出想把水壶每天拿回家洗。面对这一诉求，我曾试图通过“理客中”的辩证逻辑来确立回应的合法性，却在意识深处撞见了小我预设的一个隐蔽陷阱：为何外婆觉得不干净，那是需要被疏导的“心理问题”；而当我亲自觉知到脏，并决定拿回清洗权时，这就成了必须被执行的“客观事实”？这是不是一种双标？&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>